the personal injury and clinical negligence blog

A collaboration between Rebmark Legal Solutions and 1 Chancery Lane

No liability for kart accident: duties of care & vicarious liability

In an interesting survey of the principles giving rise to duties of care and vicarious liability, Mrs Justice Swift has handed down a liability judgment in a catastrophic injury case brought against various categories of defendant.  The claimant was injured when her scarf got caught up in the rear axle of a 4-stroke engine go-kart.  She had been one of a party of six friends in their twenties who took a kart belonging to one of them for recreational use on a newly-constructed local car park which they used.  The basis for her complaint against all defendants was that the kart was unsafe in its design because it had inadequate guards in place for the moving parts at the rear of the machine. 

The first defendant was the manufacturer of the kart.  The kart was manufactured in compliance with regulations in force at the time, but more stringent requirements for guards subsequently came into force.  The claimant discontinued against the manufacturer before judgment.

The third defendant was the owner of the kart.  He was not an experienced racer but he did own two karts.  He had acquired this one in a straight swap of a previous one for this one.  He was a builder with a very basic knowledge of motor mechanics.  He was blamed for (1) failing to warn the claimant to remove her scarf and (2) allowing the claimant to use the kart without an adequate guard in place for the moving parts.

The judge held that the claimant’s scarf was not trailing or loose when she got into the kart and there was nothing to make the risk of entanglement reasonably foreseeable to the third defendant.  What is more, it would not be fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty on the third defendant in respect of a potentially hazardous feature of the machine (the fact of moving parts) which was as obvious or hidden to him as it was to the claimant.  This was a group of friends getting together recreationally, not in any organized or commercial venture.  Echoing Lord Hoffman’s speech in Tomlinson (his tirade against the nanny state), the judge said:

I consider that it would impose an undue burden of legal responsibility on those who wish to share such equipment with other[s] who might wish to use it.  The imposition of such a burden would have potentially far-reaching consequences for those engaging in recreational activities with friends and acquaintances.

The third defendant had bought the kart from two men who were directors of a company (the second defendant) which operated a commercial karting centre.  The claimant contended that it was in reality the company which had transferred ownership of the kart to the third defendant, but this was rejected on the facts.  The claimant’s alternative argument was that the company was vicariously liable for the two men when they transferred ownership in the kart to the third defendant, and that they had breached a duty of care to the claimant by allowing it to be supplied for use without risk assessing it and making it safe to be used.

The judge held that there was no common law duty on the two men who supplied the kart to go beyond the regulations applicable to it.  What is more, it would not be fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty owed to an indeterminate number of future users in perpetuity.  Nor would there have been vicarious liability in any event, since the transaction played no role in the second defendant’s business. 


See: Poole v Wright & ors [2013] EWHC 2375 (QB), decision of Swift J.

  • Christian Louboutin

    8/14/2013 9:06:17 AM |

    This photo is Jessica Alba in  christian louboutin - http://ubcknoxville.org  sale Charleze Sandal Black 160mm, Jessica Alba wore this pair ambertina bejeweled sandal. What is actually far much more complicated is really purchasing the software via shops this kind of shoes so easily.

  • Louis Vuitton Outlet

    8/14/2013 10:07:39 AM |

    As ever, I shall post the overall standings below the line shortly. An louis vuitton purses handicapper is responsible for picking winners of football games. Both my Mexican-American husband & I have been using this same pc tv software for viewing ESPN, FOX, CBS, NBC online streams on megavideo including the 2011 louis vuitton purses Scouting Combine. The non-selection shouldn't come as entirely unforeseen, given Te'o's disappointing showing in the BCS championship game, which will increase louis vuitton purses revenues by billions of dollars worth of hats, shirts and other apparel.

    Feel free to surf to my web page ::  Louis Vuitton Outlet - http://www.tedxyse.com/louis-vuitton-outlet.html

  • Cheap NFL Jerseys For Sale

    8/14/2013 10:45:10 AM |

    You are invited to this Wholesale Jerseys match. You may have heard that Tim Tebow is now a Miami Dolphin. He, Nate Washington and Kenny Britt would give the Browns extra picks without sacrificing the opportunity to be a huge pickup for most teams. Match details: Match: Vikings VS Jets Competition: wholesale jerseys Week 9 here for you.

    Feel free to visit my web site ...  Cheap NFL Jerseys For Sale - http://cheapnfljerseys.acudragon.com

  • Jamie

    8/14/2013 3:24:39 PM |

    Thanked the old man, I walked out of the adventure of trade unions, since today is the selection of the date of the long-awaited competition is fast approaching. It is much more durable then the Nike Solde Nike Air Max+ Tailwind can befound in variety of colors and styles and it has been a complete receiver," coach Marvin Lewis said after the pick.

    my page - air max pas cher ( Jamie - http://cynthiascreativedancearts.com )

Comments are closed