Trial advocacy fees recoverable even if the matter settles on the day of trial 01 June 2016 foneill (0) TRIAL ADVOCACY FEE IS RECOVERABLE, EVEN IF THE MATTER SETTLES AT THE "DOOR OF THE COURT" - NEW DECISION FROM THE APPEAL COURT. The appeal court has found that, even where a matter settles “at the door of the court” and so no effective trial has taken place, the fixed trial advocacy fee is recoverable under CPR Pt 45 Pt IIIA. The court further found that a matter could be disposed ... [More]
Trial by ambush? 31 May 2016 Ella-Davis case report, cpr, evidence, procedure (0) In Hayden v Maidstone & Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust [2016] EWHC 1121 (QB) Foskett J, albeit with “considerable misgiving”, allowed a Defendant to rely on surveillance footage that had been disclosed so late that it caused the trial date to be vacated. The decision is not so much of interest because of its outcome but for the judge’s more general comments on the issue of when su... [More]
QOCS : applies to appeals? 27 May 2016 Thomas-Crockett costs, General, LP Procedure, personal injury, procedure (0) Qualified One-way Costs Shifting: does it apply to appeals? Yes, according to Edis J in Parker v Butler [2016] EWHC 1251 (QB), who held: 3. If (as is likely to be the case here) the claimant's access to justice is dependent on the benefit of QOCS, that access will be significantly reduced if he is exposed to a risk as to the c... [More]
Why settlement of a personal injury claim does not bring the application of the RTA Protocol to an end 28 April 2016 Ben-Hicks (0) The recent Court of Appeal decision in Phillips v Willis [2016] EWCA Civ 401 has provided welcome clarity as to the fate of claims initially made through the RTA portal when the personal injury element has been resolved prior to litigation commencing at Stage 3, but a dispute as to low-value special damages remains live between the parties. The matter in question arose out of a collision b... [More]
Paying the (full) price? Underpaid fees and limitation periods 14 April 2016 Simon-Murray courts, Relief from sanctions, Strike Out (0) If you pay less than the appropriate fee when issuing your claim before the expiry of the limitation period is your claim in time? Or do you pay the price by being statute barred? On 7 April 2016 Warby J. sitting in the QBD was asked to determine a summary judgment/strike out application in case called in Bhatti v Asghar which raised this issue. The claimants in this breach ... [More]
Cost Budgets – Rule Changes 06 April 2016 Roderick-Abbott costs, cpr, General, legislation (0) Changes to the CPR coming into force today alter the rules relating to cost budgets. In cases with a stated value of over £50,000 all parties except litigants in person will now exchange budgets 21 days before the first case management conference. Parties must then file an agreed “budget discussion report” at least 7 days before the first CMC setting out what is agreed, wha... [More]
Damages for abuse 30 March 2016 Roderick-Abbott case report, courts, Damages, General, jurisprudence, LP Vicarious Liability, personal injury, quantum, workplace claims (0) The Claimant in KCR v The Scout Association [2016] EWHC 597 (QB) suffered sustained abuse by a Cub Scout Group Leader when a young boy in the 1980s. In 2003 the abuser was convicted of a large number of sexual offences against boys including the Claimant. As might be expected, given recent trends in this area of law, the Defendant admitted that it was vicariously liable for the abuser’s acti... [More]
Claims of alleged fraud not exempt from Denton 22 March 2016 Ella-Davis case report, cpr, insurance, Mitchell, procedure, Relief from sanctions, road traffic accidents (0) “The court cannot ignore that insurers are professional litigants, who can properly be held responsible for any blatant disregard of their own commercial interests.” - Gentry v Miller & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 141 at 34. Such was the warning sent to insurers by the Court of Appeal earlier this month in allowing a Claimant’s appeal against a decision to set aside default judgme... [More]
Evidence and interim payment applications 10 March 2016 Edward-Bishop-QC case report, procedure (0) The High Court has given useful guidance (which serves as a warning) to defendants on their evidential obligations when defending applications for interim payments. In Sellar-Elliot v Howling [2016] EWHC 443 (QB) Sweeney J refused permission to appeal an interim payment order by Master Cook and held that it was not enough for a defendant to rely – when defending an application fo... [More]
Vicarious liability: extension, extension, extension 03 March 2016 Ian-Miller case report, employers liability, LP Vicarious Liability, personal injury, public authorities (0) “The law of vicarious liability is on the move” are the opening words to the opinion of Lord Reed in Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10 (quoting Lord Phillips in Various Claimants v Catholic Child Welfare Society [2012] UKSC 56). The Supreme Court has handed down two judgments in the field of vicarious liability (Cox and Mohamud v WM Morrison [2016] UKSC 11) which continue ... [More]